Yesterday Jason Calacanis posted a very positive review of The Hype Machine. To make it short, this service scans blogs for MP3s, structures data, and creates RSS feeds with enclosures for any artist. Read more on Jasons’s blog.
Though he, as well as commentators and other blogs referring to his post, also noticed that there might be legal issues. Often blogs would host copyrighted material, something the music industry is not very happy to see.
To speak from my own experience most bloggers who host songs are really passionate about music. Of course, it can be discussed if 320 kbps files are really required to provide an example of the featured music or if 128 kbps are enough. But usually they host just one song anyway. I remember a blog which featured an awesome article on modern classical music. For each featured album the cover and one track were provided. Lawyers would argue that there were two copyright infringements for each album. Maybe. I bought a Steve Reich CD the next week.
I think those blogs are great. They draw attention to music and artists I have never listened to before. I actually think they are perfect grassroots advertising vehicles for labels and artists and legal action should definitely not be taken.
Maybe some of you have read reviews on the Subvert Central Podcasts on this blog. I think they are great and varied, serving the same purpose as music blogs. But I wonder if I have to delete those posting. I don’t know. It is probably a grey area.
Related posts:
-
I share your open-mindedness towards the sharing of information on new music in the blogosphere. As a musician and a music administrator, I think I can understand the stance of those who adamantly oppose such use of the web, but my personal inclination is to view the practice from the standpoint of the overall health of the classical music recording industry, as well as what may be perceived as the digitally-driven future of the record business in general. If we concede that this business of classical music recordings, and perhaps in particular contemporary classical music, will never survive without the interest of the grassroots minority who keep it alive, then I think it makes sense not to snuff out what might otherwise be one more tool for generating interest in releases that will never benefit from the advantage of large marketing budgets. Of course, there is an ethical line to be avoided somewhere in all of this. Giving away entire albums of music would ultimately do great damage to the industry, affecting performers, producers and retailers.
Chandler Branch, Exe. Dir.
Soli Deo Gloria -
I’ve meaning to write about this subject for a while, seeing how I run a similar music blog with variety of featured downloadable songs (not albums).
I completely share your standpoint regarding this issue. I’d also add that since I’m not making money out of the blog nor do I plan to, I think that creates a situation where copyright infringement can be overlooked in pursuit of the greater good when, as a result of my blog, many people discover new artists and hopefully buy their CDs.
-
I used to never listen to country music, but it’s changed. A lot of it is more mainstream and I like that. Plus the women are hot and that makes everything better!

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://notsorelevant.com/2007-01-26/music-blogs-and-copyrights/trackback/